Blog | Canidium

The Comprehensive Guide to Technical Health Checks: Steps, Timeline, and Best Practices

Written by Sarah Pultorak | Jan 16, 2025 9:35:02 PM

Your digital infrastructure isn't set in stone. Just like you take your car to the mechanic, you will occasionally need to bring in experts to diagnose hidden inefficiencies and rectify existing issues in your system. If you are preparing for significant upgrades, implementing a new solution, or are aware of issues within your system, a technical health check is vital.

Our technical health check (THC) team helps clients increase the value of their existing software investments through essential maintenance and problem prevention. They also help clients minimize risk when implementing new solutions by delving into systems and correcting potential issues. 

Companies with significant software investments should consider technical health checks as a value add. But first, it helps to learn more about the process. This article outlines the core aspects of a technical health check, including its phases, timeline, and potential outcomes.

 

The 3 Phases of a Technical Health Check

Technical health checks typically unfold across three primary phases. Each phase is integral to uncovering issues, documenting findings, and, when necessary, implementing solutions to optimize system performance.

1. Information Gathering

This foundational phase involves thoroughly diving into the system to collect all relevant data and understand its current state. The goal is to identify what has been built, how it operates, and any challenges that might exist. Key activities in this phase include:

  • Reviewing the Current Setup and Architecture: The team evaluates the technical architecture, workflows, and configurations to identify areas that might need improvement or optimization.
  • Conducting Meetings: Meetings with the THC team are held to uncover known issues, inefficiencies, or areas of concern. These discussions are critical for gathering insights that might not be apparent from the system alone, such as persistent problems, user frustrations, or operational bottlenecks.
  • Assessing Existing Documentation: The team reviews any available documentation, such as operational guides or process flows, to understand the system's intended functionality and pinpoint gaps in knowledge or resources.
  • Uncovering "Low-Hanging Fruit": Early identification of easily addressable issues—obvious to you or discovered during the initial review—provides immediate value while building trust with your technical health check team.

This phase sets the foundation for the subsequent steps by ensuring that the team comprehensively understands the system and any challenges the client faces.

How to Prepare for The First Step in a Technical Health Check

There are several steps you should take before the first phase of your technical health check to ensure a smooth and productive process:

  • Provide System Access: Ensure that the health check team has the necessary permissions to review the environment.
  • Gather Existing Documentation: Share operational guides, process flows, or any other relevant materials.
  • Identify Known Issues: Compile a list of current pain points or areas of concern to help prioritize efforts.

2. Analysis and Documentation

After gathering all necessary information, the next phase focuses on analyzing the findings and preparing detailed documentation. This step transforms raw data and observations into actionable insights that guide decision-making. The key components of this phase include:

  • Creating a Comprehensive Report or Slide Deck: The deliverable for this phase is typically a document or slide deck tailored to your needs. This report summarizes the findings and provides a clear roadmap for addressing issues.
  • Outlining Inefficiencies and Defects: This document highlights specific areas where the system is underperforming or not meeting its potential. These may include technical inefficiencies, operational bottlenecks, or defects affecting functionality.
  • Providing Recommendations for Improvement: Each identified issue is accompanied by practical recommendations for addressing it, which are aligned with your business objectives and technical constraints.
  • Prioritizing Remediation Efforts: A prioritization framework is included to help you focus on resolving the most critical issues first. This ensures that limited resources are allocated effectively and that urgent problems are addressed promptly.

The documentation produced during this phase not only serves as a guide for remediation but also as a valuable resource, providing you with a deeper understanding of your system.

3. Remedial Work 

The final phase involves acting on the recommendations outlined in the analysis and documentation phase. While this phase is optional, many clients choose to proceed with remediation to address the issues identified. Key aspects of this phase include:

  • Resolving Critical System Problems: Immediate attention is given to resolving high-priority issues affecting system performance or reliability.
  • Removing Outdated or Redundant Data: Efforts may involve cleaning up old data that is no longer used but continues to take up valuable system resources.
  • Optimizing Workflows: Workflow improvements focus on enhancing efficiency and ensuring the system effectively supports your business processes.
  • Improving Operational Documentation: This phase may include creating or updating an operations guide if existing documentation is incomplete or outdated. This provides a clear understanding of how your system works and how to maintain it moving forward.
  • Collaborative Prioritization: You play a central role in deciding which issues to address based on your budget, time constraints, and business priorities. This collaborative approach ensures that the remediation efforts align with your immediate and long-term goals.
  • Flexibility for Additional Engagement: If significant problems are uncovered or your needs evolve, the health check can transition into a longer-term engagement. This might involve a separate agreement for further work or extending the scope of the current project.

By the end of this phase, the system should be operating more efficiently, with critical issues resolved and a clear plan in place for future maintenance and optimization.

 

Technical Health Check Timeline Expectations

The timeline for a technical health check can vary depending on the complexity of the system and the scope of the engagement. However, a standard health check often spans about two weeks from start to finish.

  • Week 1: Initial kickoff meeting, information gathering, and exploratory analysis.
  • Week 2: Finalization of findings, report creation, and recommendations presentation.

For particularly complex systems or those with critical issues, the timeline may extend, and certain tasks might shift into the remedial phase.

 

Budget Considerations

Budget sensitivity is a key factor in structuring a technical health check. While pricing can vary based on the client's needs, the general approach is to keep costs manageable. It's common for a portion of the budget to go toward the analysis and documentation phase. The remaining budget can then be allocated to remediation efforts, allowing for tangible improvements within the same engagement.

Canidium's team tailors contracts to the client's needs, often as a time-and-materials engagement. This flexible approach helps build trust and ensures that clients feel they are getting value from the process.

 

The Benefits of a Technical Health Check

A technical health check provides a wide range of benefits that can positively impact system performance, user satisfaction, and overall business operations. By diving deep into a system's technical and operational aspects, this process ensures that organizations maximize their investment in technology while maintaining alignment with their strategic goals. Below, we expand on the key benefits:

Improved System Performance

A technical health check identifies inefficiencies and defects that may be hindering the system's performance. These could include slow processing times, outdated workflows, or misconfigurations that create bottlenecks. By addressing these issues, organizations can optimize their systems to run faster and more efficiently, improving user experience and productivity. Whether fine-tuning processes or resolving critical issues, enhanced system performance often translates into tangible business benefits, such as reduced downtime and increased operational agility.

Enhanced Documentation

Many organizations struggle with incomplete or outdated documentation, which can lead to confusion and inefficiencies. As part of a technical health check, the team may create or update operational guides tailored to the client's specific needs. These documents provide a clear roadmap for managing the system, troubleshooting issues, and onboarding new team members. Having accurate and comprehensive documentation in place empowers internal teams to maintain and improve the system effectively over time, reducing reliance on external support and ensuring continuity in knowledge management.

Proactive Maintenance

A health check allows organizations to take a proactive approach to system maintenance. By uncovering latent issues before they escalate into critical problems, the process helps avoid unexpected disruptions and costly downtime. This forward-thinking approach not only protects the organization's investment in technology but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement. Proactive maintenance can also save cost by preventing emergency repairs or rushed upgrades, which are often more expensive and disruptive.

Smooth Upgrades and Migrations

A health check is an essential preparatory step for organizations planning significant system upgrades or migrations. It helps identify potential compatibility issues, cleans up outdated data, and ensures that the current system is in optimal condition before transitioning to a new environment. This reduces the risk of carrying over inefficiencies or defects into the upgraded system. By addressing these issues upfront, the process ensures a smoother, more successful transition, minimizing disruptions and accelerating the time-to-value of the new solution.

Cost-Effective Problem Resolution

A technical health check is a cost-effective way to address system issues and inefficiencies. Rather than committing to a full-scale overhaul, organizations can focus on resolving the most critical problems within a manageable budget. The process often includes a prioritization framework, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively to achieve maximum impact. For clients concerned about costs, the flexibility of the health check—whether it results in minimal adjustments or more extensive remedial work—provides assurance that they are getting value for their investment.

 

Understanding Technical Health Checks

The structure of a health check is adaptable based on client preferences and priorities. For instance, some clients may prefer a focused documentation effort, while others may require immediate resolution of critical issues. The flexibility of these engagements helps cater to both short-term needs and long-term objectives.

A technical health check is more than just an audit; it's an opportunity to align a system's performance with your ultimate goals. By combining a thorough analysis, actionable recommendations, and collaborative remediation, you can unlock your systems' full potential. Whether you're preparing for an upgrade, addressing long-standing issues, or simply looking to optimize performance, a health check is an investment in operational excellence.

Contact our technical health check experts to learn more.